Complete this form and our team will get back to you as soon as possible
You can file a DC personal injury government claim when the harm is connected to a District agency, a public employee, or a condition on public property. These claims arise when responsibility for what happened rests with the District rather than a private individual or business.
An injury involving the DC government can happen in a range of everyday situations. You may be hurt on a public sidewalk, involved in an accident with a city vehicle, or injured in a building maintained by a District agency. In more serious cases, these incidents can also result in wrongful death, allowing surviving family members to pursue a claim on behalf of a loved one.
In practical terms, this can include situations where DC government employee negligence leads to an accident, as well as cases where unsafe conditions on public property cause injury. The key question is whether what happened falls within the responsibilities of the District and how those responsibilities were carried out at the time.
Before taking any further action, it is important to identify who is responsible. The process you follow, how quickly you need to act, and where your claim must be sent all depend on that answer.
Each responsible entity has its own timeline, its own starting point, and its own way of handling claims before they ever reach a courtroom.
Claims against the District involve local agencies, departments, and employees. These cases are governed by DC Code 12-309, which requires written notice to be provided within six months of the injury.
This six-month window is short and strictly enforced. Your Washington, DC tort claim notice must be sent to the DC Office of Risk Management, on behalf of the Mayor, before you can move forward to sue the District of Columbia.
The notice must clearly explain what happened, including when and where the incident occurred, how the injury occurred, and the harm suffered. Filing a DC Office of Risk Management claim with complete and accurate information is what allows the claim to be reviewed.
Once the notice is received, the Office of Risk Management opens a file, gathers information from the claimant and the relevant agency, and investigates the circumstances of the incident. The District then decides whether to accept the claim and move toward settlement or deny it.
If the claim is denied, this does not end the process. It means the claimant can move forward with a lawsuit in court. That lawsuit must be filed within three years of the original injury date — the same statute of limitations that applies to most personal injury claims in DC. Unlike a federal claim, the ORM review is not a lengthy administrative process. It is a procedural requirement that must be satisfied before the case can proceed to litigation.
If the injury involves a federal agency, federal employee, or federal property, the claim is handled under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) rather than DC Code § 12-309.
This distinction matters more in Washington, DC, than almost anywhere else in the country. Many buildings, plazas, and public spaces in the city that appear to be part of the local landscape are actually federally owned or operated courthouses, government office buildings, national memorials, and certain parks, among them. An injury that looks like a DC government claim may fall under the FTCA depending on who owns and maintains the property where it happened.
The process begins with an administrative claim filed directly with the agency involved, using Form 95. This form requires a clear description of what happened, the injuries involved, and the amount of compensation being claimed.
In most cases, you have up to two years to submit this claim. Once filed, the agency reviews it, may request additional information, and decides whether to accept or deny it.
If the claim is denied or if the agency does not resolve it within the required time, you can then proceed with a lawsuit in federal court. This structured review process is what makes federal claims more drawn out than a DC government injury claim.
Claims involving the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority follow a separate process from both DC and federal claims. WMATA is an interstate entity created by agreement between the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia, and it operates under its own legal framework.
A WMATA injury claim still requires a formal Notice of Claim within six months of the injury. While that timing aligns with DC Code 12-309, the notice is not sent to the District. Instead, it must be directed to WMATA’s own Third Party Liability or claims office, at 300 7th St SW.
This is where the distinction becomes important. Even though the six-month deadline comes from DC law, WMATA claims are handled through WMATA’s own system. The notice should be sent directly to WMATA by certified mail with proof of delivery, and must clearly explain when and where the incident occurred, how it happened, the injuries involved, and the negligence being alleged.
The combination of shared timing but separate processes is what makes WMATA claims different from both DC government claims and federal claims.
In most situations, identifying the correct claim type comes down to a combination of where the incident occurred and which government entity was responsible for the activity. The location is a starting point, but it is not always the full answer.
For claims against the District, the key question is whether the area or service involved is managed by a DC agency. Sidewalks, local roads, public schools, and District-owned buildings are usually maintained by the city. Accidents involving DC government vehicles or employees carrying out their duties also fall into this category.
Federal claims involve federal control rather than just federal location. Many buildings in Washington, DC, are federally owned or operated, including courthouses, office buildings, and certain public spaces. If the injury involves a federal agency, a federal employee, or property managed by the federal government, the claim will fall under the FTCA.
WMATA claims are typically easier to identify. If the incident involves a Metro train, Metrobus, or Metrorail station, the claim follows WMATA’s process rather than the rules that apply to DC or federal claims.
Getting this right early on makes a difference. Each system has its own deadlines and filing requirements, and starting down the wrong path can lead to delays or missed opportunities to move your claim forward.
Filing a DC government injury claim involves steps that need to be handled correctly from the beginning. The timeline is short, the notice requirement is strict, and the process depends on identifying the responsible entity early on.
Understanding where to send the claim, how to set out what happened, and how to meet the required deadlines can directly affect how the case progresses. Mistakes at the outset, especially around timing or notice requirements, can limit what happens next.
At Regan Zambri Long our award-winning board-certified attorneys ensure each step is handled in accordance with the proper procedure. From preparing the initial notice to pursuing a lawsuit against the DC government for negligence, we will guide you through the process and ensure all requirements are met at every stage. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Have you or your loved one sustained injuries in Washington DC, Maryland or Virginia? Regan Zambri Long PLLC has the best lawyers in the country to analyze your case and answer the questions you may have.