Call Us Now 202-463-3030
Schedule a Free Consultation

What Is a Strict Liability Personal Injury Claim?

When a defective space heater explodes in your apartment, or a neighbor’s exotic pet attacks you, you don’t always need to prove it was caused by negligence. In certain cases, Washington, DC law recognizes strict liability personal injury claims. This means the person or company is responsible, no matter how careful they were. This legal rule can make pursuing compensation much easier when dangerous products or activities cause harm.

In traditional negligence cases, you have to prove someone acted unreasonably. Strict liability works differently. It focuses on the danger of an activity or defect in a product. You don’t need to show the manufacturer made mistakes during production. You don’t need to prove the business owner failed to take proper precautions. The question becomes simpler: Did this defective product or unreasonably dangerous activity directly cause your injuries?

Understanding strict liability and when it applies can strengthen your case. However, DC’s harsh legal standards still threaten your recovery. If you’re found even slightly at fault, you could lose everything. It’s important to take action early because there are time limitations and complex evidence requirements. A knowledgeable Washington, DC, personal injury lawyer can evaluate whether your injuries qualify for strict liability protection. They can guide you through the claims process from day one.

Schedule a free consultation

Contact Us Form

Complete this form and our team will get back to you as soon as possible

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
regan badge
logo 1.png
nbta.png
superlawyers 1 2 1.png
superlawyers 1 1.png
isob 1.png
copy of washingtonian 1.png

Proving a Strict Liability Case

The legal basis of strict liability is that some activities and products are very dangerous. Society benefits when we hold those responsible accountable, no matter how careful they are. In Washington, DC, strict liability cases have three main parts. First, the defendant’s conduct was very dangerous, or they made a faulty product. Second, this action or product caused the plaintiff’s injury. Third, the plaintiff experienced real damages because of it.

$77

MILLION

Wrongful Death Settlement

$20

MILLION

Brain Injury
Verdict

$19.5

MILLION

Wrongful Death Verdict

$16

MILLION

Premises Liability Settlement

$15.2

MILLION

Wrongful Death Settlement

$15.2​

MILLION

Wrongful Death Verdict

$15

MILLION

Medical Malpractice Settlement

$14

MILLION

Personal Injury Settlement

$14

MILLION

Car Accident Settlement

See Many More

How Being Held Strictly Liable Is Different Than Negligence

The key difference between strict liability and negligence is what you have to prove. In negligence, you have to show that the defendant had a duty of care, they broke it by acting unreasonably, and that it caused your injuries. Strict liability doesn’t require proving breach or unreasonable conduct, only that an inherently dangerous activity or faulty product caused harm. 
In a texting-while-driving accident, you must prove that the other driver was negligent. In a faulty brakes case, you’d sue the manufacturer for being strictly liable, focusing on the brake defect. It doesn’t matter if the manufacturer acted reasonably during production.

The Importance of Evidence

This distinction becomes particularly important when dealing with evidence collection. For strict liability personal injury claims in Washington, DC, you should act quickly. First, document the scene. Next, keep any defective products or evidence of dangerous activities. Get copies of medical records that show your injuries. Finally, gather witness statements about what happened. Each piece of evidence helps skilled personal injury lawyers develop a strong case.

Common Strict Liability Cases in Washington, DC

Strict liability applies to several specific situations in the District. The most common categories include defective products, dangerous activities, and animal attacks.

Defective Products

When a defective escalator at a Metro station malfunctions and injures riders, or contaminated food from a DC restaurant causes illness, victims can file strict liability claims without proving the company was careless, even if there is an explicit or implied warranty. Product liability claims are the most common type of strict liability case in the District.

Washington, DC courts recognize three types of product defects:
  • Manufacturing defects: errors that occur during the production and manufacturing process, like a batch of medications with incorrect dosages
  • Design defects: inherent flaws that make products unsafe even when manufactured correctly, such as a car model prone to rollovers
  • Failure to warn: missing or inadequate warnings about known risks when using the product as intended
Recent DC strict liability settlements have involved faulty medical devices that broke during surgery, children’s toys with toxic chemicals, defective E-scooter brakes, and car parts that failed during normal use. The key is showing the product defect caused injury during normal use, not proving fault.

Abnormally Dangerous Activities

Construction work that cracks foundations in Capitol Hill rowhouses. Chemical storage facilities near residential neighborhoods in Northeast DC. Heavy industrial equipment operating in densely populated areas. These abnormally dangerous activities create strict liability for any injuries they cause.

DC courts recognize that some commercial activities carry risks no matter how carefully they’re performed. When injuries result from blasting, hazardous material storage, or other ultra-hazardous operations, this meets the strict liability standard. Victims can pursue compensation without proving that there was negligence. The activity’s inherent danger is enough for the company to be held strictly liable.

Dog Bites and Other Animal Attacks

In DC, Code Section 8-1808, the law holds dog owners strictly liable for bite injuries, even without a history of aggression or owner negligence. With dog bite cases, you don’t need to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous or acted carelessly. Exceptions include trespassing, provoking the animal, or committing crimes during the attack, which can prevent you from recovering damages. 

Beyond pets, liability extends to injuries from exotic animals or livestock, like pythons or tigers, as courts see these wild animals as inherently dangerous regardless of training or containment.
Free Consult Today!
dc motorcycle accident lawyer Christopher Regan

Washington, DC, Strict Liability Laws and Precedents

Even in strict liability cases, DC uses one of the strictest legal doctrines in the country, known as contributory negligence. If you ignore a warning label on a faulty product and get injured, or provoke a dog and it attacks you, you might not be able to recover damages. Even slightly misusing a product can let the manufacturer off the hook. This strict standard makes it really important to keep detailed records and seek legal advice right away. 
Washington, DC courts apply strict liability more broadly than others in the metro area, especially in product liability cases. Surrounding states often require additional proof that a product was both unreasonably dangerous and defective. An experienced personal injury attorney can help determine which jurisdiction’s laws apply and where to file your claim for the best outcome.
DC’s strict liability framework comes from both statutory law and court decisions. Product liability claims fall under general tort law, which was shaped by decades of court rulings. The DC Court of Appeals consistently holds that strict liability applies when defendants engage in abnormally dangerous activities or sell defective products, regardless of their level of care.

Speak to a DC Personal Injury Attorney Now

Free Consult Today!

Contact Our DC Strict Liability Attorneys

Time is critical in strict liability cases, and waiting can damage your case. Evidence disappears, witnesses forget details, and flawed products get discarded. Take action immediately by documenting the scene, seeking medical attention, and preserving any defective products or physical evidence.

Our Washington, DC, strict liability attorneys understand the complex legal theories and principles that apply to defective products, unreasonably dangerous activities, and animal attacks. We know how to gather the evidence needed to prove your case and protect you from contributory negligence defenses. We provide free consultations so you can learn about your rights without any financial risk.

Personal injury law exists to protect people injured by dangerous products or activities. Our legal team is ready to discuss your case and review your options for compensation. Contact one of our experienced personal injury attorneys in Washington, DC, today.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Types of Cases Qualify for Strict Liability in Washington, DC?

Most personal injury cases involving strict liability in DC involve product liability claims. This includes things like faulty medical devices, dangerous toys, or defective car parts. Abnormally dangerous activities, such as construction, blasting, or storing hazardous chemicals, are also common. Finally, dog bites and attacks by exotic animals qualify. If you’re injured by any of these types of personal injury, you may have a strict liability claim without needing to prove negligence.

Can I Still Recover Compensation if I Was Partially At Fault?

No. DC follows a harsh contributory negligence rule that applies even to strict liability cases. If you’re found even 1% at fault for your injuries, like ignoring warning labels on a defective product or provoking an animal, you could lose your entire claim. This makes proper documentation and early legal representation critical for your personal injury claim.

How Do I Prove Someone Else Was Strictly Liable?

Strict liability cases are generally easier to prove than traditional negligence claims because you don’t need to show the defendant acted carelessly. However, you still need to establish certain legal elements to win your case. You must prove three things:
  • The defendant engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity or produced a faulty product.
  • This activity or product directly caused your injuries.
  • You suffered actual damages as a result.
Unlike negligence cases, you don’t need to prove the defendant breached a duty of care or acted unreasonably. An experienced attorney can help gather the evidence needed to establish these elements and build a strong case for compensation.

Table of Contents

Personal Injury

Call
Email

Schedule a Free Consultation

Have you or your loved one sustained injuries in Washington DC, Maryland or Virginia? Regan Zambri Long PLLC has the best lawyers in the country to analyze your case and answer the questions you may have.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.